Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-22 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.12 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is way better than the BLU G9, having a general score of 81.7 against 61.6. Even though the Galaxy S8 is much older than BLU G9, it's design is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Galaxy S8 counts with a little faster processor than BLU G9. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a much better looking display than BLU G9, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S8 features just a bit more storage for games and applications than BLU G9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S8 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S8 features a lot better camera than BLU G9, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution. BLU G9 counts with better battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy S8 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the BLU G9.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.