Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-08-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.38 x 3.03 x 0.40 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Purple Haze | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G90T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP4 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is much better than BLU G90 Pro's 68.2 overall score. HTC One M9's design is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter than BLU G90 Pro, even though it was released 6 years before. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while BLU G90 Pro has Android 10.
HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better processing power than BLU G90 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 counts with a sharper screen than BLU G90 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each screen inch.
BLU G90 Pro captures clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the BLU G90 Pro also has a bigger aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back. The BLU G90 Pro has much more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 128 GB, the BLU G90 Pro also has 128 GB internal storage.
BLU G90 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, HTC One M9 is also cheaper, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.