Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-27 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.38 x 3.03 x 0.40 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Purple Haze | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G90T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is better than BLU G90 Pro's 68.2 score. Although Galaxy S8 is a lot older than the BLU G90 Pro, it's body is a lot thinner and extremely lighter. The Galaxy S8 counts with a brighter display than BLU G90 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher pixels density.
Galaxy S8 has a bit better performance than BLU G90 Pro. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The BLU G90 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the BLU G90 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
BLU G90 Pro has more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The BLU G90 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the BLU G90 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.