Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gradient magenta and Pearl white | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio A25 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot better than BLU G90, with an 82.5 score against 62.9. Although Google Pixel 2 XL is much older than BLU G90, it's design is a little lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 2 XL features a much sharper display than BLU G90, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better number of pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than BLU G90, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better CPU than BLU G90. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better camera than BLU G90, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution, a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and a larger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
BLU G90 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Google Pixel 2 XL costs a little more than the BLU G90, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.