Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gradient magenta and Pearl white | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio A25 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than BLU G90's general score of 62.9. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is older than the BLU G90, it's body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better processing power than BLU G90. Both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 features a more vivid display than BLU G90, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a way better pixels density. The BLU G90 counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the BLU G90 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better camera than BLU G90, because although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
BLU G90 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more money than BLU G90, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.