Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR Series 554 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a lot better than BLU Life One M's score of 50.6. The Samsung Galaxy S9 design is just a little thinner but just a bit heavier than the BLU Life One M. Galaxy S9 features a much better display than BLU Life One M, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a quite better hardware performance than BLU Life One M, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Galaxy S9 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than BLU Life One M, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much better camera than BLU Life One M, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S9 also has a much better 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy S9 features a way better battery performance than BLU Life One M, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The Galaxy S9 is a little more expensive than BLU Life One M, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.