Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-12-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the BLU Life One X3's score of 60.1. Even though LG V35 ThinQ and BLU Life One X3 were released with only 6 months difference, LG V35 ThinQ is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ has a brighter screen than BLU Life One X3, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a little larger display.
LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than BLU Life One X3, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better performing processor than BLU Life One X3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
BLU Life One X3 counts with a much longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ shoots much clearer photographs and videos than BLU Life One X3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better low light captures, a more megapixels back facing camera and a much better video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than BLU Life One X3, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.