Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.41 x 2.66 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 3.84 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is much better than the BLU Life Play S, with a overall score of 81.9 against 52.3. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's design is noticeably heavier and much thicker than the BLU Life Play S. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better performance than BLU Life Play S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S8 Active features just a bit better looking display than BLU Life Play S, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, a way better screen density and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than BLU Life Play S, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a superior battery performance than BLU Life Play S, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 1800mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a way better camera than BLU Life Play S, because it has a much better (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 12 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is also cheap compared to the BLU Life Play S, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.