Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.39 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 1.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot better than BLU Life Play, having an 80.7 score against 48.9. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a notably heavier device than the BLU Life Play, but both are equally thin. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a superior hardware performance than BLU Life Play, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better screen than BLU Life Play, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of screen, a lot bigger display and a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Life Play, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a way better battery lifetime than BLU Life Play, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity against 1800mAh. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better camera than BLU Life Play, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way more megapixels camera.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs a bit more money than BLU Life Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.