Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.12 x 2.54 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 544 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is way better than BLU Life Pure mini, with a global score of 83.3 against 51.2. Samsung Galaxy S9's design is just a bit thinner but a little heavier than the BLU Life Pure mini. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better screen than BLU Life Pure mini, because it has a way greater display density, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a superior processing unit than BLU Life Pure mini, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S9 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than BLU Life Pure mini, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB and 48 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S9's battery performance is very similar to the BLU Life Pure mini one. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better camera than BLU Life Pure mini, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy S9 is a bit more expensive than the BLU Life Pure mini, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.