Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.59 x 2.73 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a lot better than the BLU Life Pure's overall score of 56.9. The Google Pixel 3 is a heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than BLU Life Pure. The BLU Life Pure has just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
Google Pixel 3 has just a little better hardware performance than BLU Life Pure, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much bigger memory to install games and applications than BLU Life Pure, because it has more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much better camera than BLU Life Pure, because although it has a lesser megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Google Pixel 3 has a much better battery lifetime than BLU Life Pure, because it has a 44 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than BLU Life Pure, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.