Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.59 x 2.73 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2020mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than the BLU Life Pure's 56.9 overall score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S9 is a incredibly heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the BLU Life Pure. BLU Life Pure counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit smaller screen and a little lower screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than BLU Life Pure, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S9 counts with a quite better performance than BLU Life Pure, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy S9 shoots much better photographs and videos than BLU Life Pure, because although it has a lesser MP camera, it also counts with a lot better video definition. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much longer battery life than BLU Life Pure, because it has a 49 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than BLU Life Pure, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.