Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-05-31 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.00 x 2.82 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 282 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a lot better than BLU Pure View's 59.2 general score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version and BLU Pure View has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although HTC One M9 is much older and thicker than the BLU Pure View, it's body is still lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with a much better display than BLU Pure View, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher display density and a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. HTC One M9 features a superior processing power than BLU Pure View, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU and 3 GB of RAM, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics processor.
HTC One M9 has a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than BLU Pure View, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the HTC One M9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. HTC One M9 features a better camera than BLU Pure View, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
BLU Pure View has just a bit longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC One M9 is also cheap compared to the BLU Pure View, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.