Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.24 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold | Prism cube black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the BLU Pure XL's score of 64.6. The Galaxy A51 5G is a extremely newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than BLU Pure XL. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better CPU than BLU Pure XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The BLU Pure XL counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than BLU Pure XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than BLU Pure XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has improved battery life than BLU Pure XL, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is also cheaper, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.