Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2015-09-09 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.24 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 335.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.4 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Edge is much better than the BLU Pure XL, getting a general score of 81.7 against 64.6. Although the Galaxy Note Edge is older than the BLU Pure XL, it's design is lighter and thinner. Galaxy Note Edge features a sharper display than BLU Pure XL, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per screen inch.
The BLU Pure XL has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Edge, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge counts with a bit superior processor than BLU Pure XL, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a graphics processor.
BLU Pure XL features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has a 17% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note Edge captures just a bit better photographs and videos than BLU Pure XL, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 16 megapixels resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller sensor which provides a worse image and video quality.
Galaxy Note Edge not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.