Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-09-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.24 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than BLU Pure XL, getting an 81.9 score against 64.3. The Google Pixel 4 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the BLU Pure XL. Google Pixel 4 counts with a faster CPU than BLU Pure XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 7 more CPU cores.
The BLU Pure XL counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a bit bigger display, a bit better pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The BLU Pure XL counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the BLU Pure XL also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB.
The BLU Pure XL counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better camera than BLU Pure XL, although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution camera, a lower video resolution and a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.