Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.24 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold | Just black |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a lot better than the BLU Pure XL's global score of 64.3. The Google Pixel 4a is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also a lot lighter and thinner than BLU Pure XL. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version and BLU Pure XL has Android 5.1, so it gives some additional features.
Google Pixel 4a has a better performance than BLU Pure XL, because it has more RAM and more processing cores. BLU Pure XL counts with a better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440, a just a bit higher display pixels density and a quite larger screen.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than BLU Pure XL, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. BLU Pure XL counts with a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better camera than BLU Pure XL, although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution, a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures and a worse (4K) video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.