Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.24 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold | Prism cube black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than BLU Pure XL's general score of 64.3. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a a lot newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a little bit lighter than BLU Pure XL. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and BLU Pure XL has Android 5.1 version, so it gives some extra features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a quite better hardware performance than BLU Pure XL, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. BLU Pure XL counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a just a little better pixel count in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Pure XL, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G captures way better pictures and videos than BLU Pure XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera with a much higher resolution and a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with improved battery life than BLU Pure XL, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the BLU Pure XL.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.