Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-01-22 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.11 x 3.03 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is much better than BLU R2 Plus, having a 77.7 score against 59.3. The HTC One M9 is a notably older and a bit thicker phone than BLU R2 Plus, but HTC made it just a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while BLU R2 Plus has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The HTC One M9 features a brighter display than BLU R2 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the HTC One M9 also counts with a bit better pixel density. HTC One M9 has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than BLU R2 Plus, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the HTC One M9 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 128 GB.
HTC One M9 counts with a faster CPU than BLU R2 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics co-processor. The BLU R2 Plus features just a little better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
HTC One M9 features a much better camera than BLU R2 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, HTC One M9 is also cheaper than the BLU R2 Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.