Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Nokia |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-01-22 | 2019-06-10 |
| 6.11 x 3.03 x 0.36 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A has a score of 64.8, which is slightly better than BLU R2 Plus's overall score of 59.3. The Nokia 3.1 A body is newer and just a little lighter, but also just a little thicker than the BLU R2 Plus. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 A has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while BLU R2 Plus has Android 7.0 Nougat, so it gives a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a bit better processing unit than BLU R2 Plus, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. BLU R2 Plus has a little sharper display than Nokia 3.1 A, and although they both have a same size display, the BLU R2 Plus also has a greater pixels quantity per display inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than BLU R2 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. The Nokia 3.1 A has a battery duration that is very similar to the BLU R2 Plus one, although the Nokia 3.1 A has 2990mAh of battery capacity.
The BLU R2 Plus counts with a bit better camera than Nokia 3.1 A, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the BLU R2 Plus also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia 3.1 A is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.