Compare phones
BLU SAMBA Q
Q100Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 27.8 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 4.13 x 2.28 x 0.55 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Purple and Yellow | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| 64 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.5 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 4 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.96 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola W175 has a general score of 28.6, which is a little bit better than BLU SAMBA Q's general score of 27.8. The Motorola W175 is a notably lighter cellphone than the BLU SAMBA Q, but both are 0.55inches thick. The Motorola W175's processing unit is just as good as the BLU SAMBA Q one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.
The Motorola W175 features a better looking screen than BLU SAMBA Q, because it has a much greater pixel density. The BLU SAMBA Q takes much better photos and videos than Motorola W175. The BLU SAMBA Q features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola W175, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 4 GB.
Motorola W175 features improved battery life than BLU SAMBA Q, because it has a 940mAh battery size.
Motorola W175 costs the same than the BLU SAMBA Q, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.