Search


Compare phones

Nokia 1661

1661, 1662
Global Score
27.827.3
Basic Information
BLUNokia
--2008-11-04
4.13 x 2.28 x 0.55 inches4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches
4.23 ounces2.89 ounces
Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Purple and Yellow--
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches1.8 inches
--128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
64 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.55.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 4 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.960
Camera
0.30 MP--
3.630
GPRS and GSMGSM
SIMSIM
0.20.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
600 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
500 hours standby time
3.9 hours talk time
2.242.32
Infra-red port--
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The BLU SAMBA Q has a general score of 27.8, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 1661's 27.3 overall score. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the BLU SAMBA Q is a a little thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than Nokia 1661. The Nokia 1661 counts with a better looking display than BLU SAMBA Q, and although they both have a same size screen, the Nokia 1661 also has a lot greater screen pixels density.

BLU SAMBA Q has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia 1661, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 4 GB. The Nokia 1661 counts with a CPU that's just as good as BLU SAMBA Q's processor, both of them have 0 processing cores. BLU SAMBA Q captures way better videos and photos than Nokia 1661.

The Nokia 1661 has a little longer battery lifetime than BLU SAMBA Q, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size.

BLU SAMBA Q and the Nokia 1661 cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.