Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.826.2
Basic Information
BLUNokia
--Symbian 9.1
--2006-09-12
4.13 x 2.28 x 0.55 inches4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches
4.23 ounces5.10 ounces
Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Purple and Yellow--
$ 40.00$ 39.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches--
--320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
64 pixels per inch--
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.53.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory81,92 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 4 GB) external memory slotminiSD external memory slot
0.960.5
Camera
0.30 MP--
3.630
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
600 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
336 hours standby time
5.5 hours talk time
2.243.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0
Infra-red portInfra-red port

Comparison review

BLU SAMBA Q is a bit better than Nokia E62, having a overall score of 27.8 against 26.2. The BLU SAMBA Q is a lighter phone than the Nokia E62, but both are equally thin. The Nokia E62 and BLU SAMBA Q both count with incredibly similar CPUs, both have a 0-Core processing unit. BLU SAMBA Q has a way better display than Nokia E62.

BLU SAMBA Q shoots way better photos and videos than Nokia E62. BLU SAMBA Q has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia E62, although it has only 32,77 MB internal memory capacity. The Nokia E62 features a very superior battery life than BLU SAMBA Q, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity.

The BLU SAMBA Q costs a bit more than Nokia E62, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.