Compare phones
BLU SAMBA Q
Q100| Global Score | |
| 27.8 | 26.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| -- | 2006-09-12 |
| 4.13 x 2.28 x 0.55 inches | 4.60 x 2.74 x 0.55 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.10 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Purple and Yellow | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 39.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.8 inches | -- |
| -- | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 64 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.5 | 3.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 81,92 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 4 GB) external memory slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0.96 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 336 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
BLU SAMBA Q is a bit better than Nokia E62, having a overall score of 27.8 against 26.2. The BLU SAMBA Q is a lighter phone than the Nokia E62, but both are equally thin. The Nokia E62 and BLU SAMBA Q both count with incredibly similar CPUs, both have a 0-Core processing unit. BLU SAMBA Q has a way better display than Nokia E62.
BLU SAMBA Q shoots way better photos and videos than Nokia E62. BLU SAMBA Q has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia E62, although it has only 32,77 MB internal memory capacity. The Nokia E62 features a very superior battery life than BLU SAMBA Q, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity.
The BLU SAMBA Q costs a bit more than Nokia E62, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.