Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.71 x 2.87 x 0.38 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 800 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a lot better than the BLU Studio 5.0 CE, with a 79.5 score against 47. Samsung Galaxy S7 is a thinner and lighter phone than BLU Studio 5.0 CE. The Galaxy S7 features a lot better screen than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because it has a little bit larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a little better performance than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The Galaxy S7 counts with a way better camera than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because it has a much better video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 200 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better battery lifetime than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.