Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.4 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | ZTE |
| Android 4.1 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2018-03-30 |
| 5.79 x 3.03 x 0.43 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 85.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 187 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.74 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.6 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.4 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 160 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go is a bit better than BLU Studio 5.0, having a 50.8 score against 46.4. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Tempo Go has the newer 8.1 Oreo version and BLU Studio 5.0 has Android 4.1 version, giving some nice extra features. ZTE Tempo Go's body is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the BLU Studio 5.0.
The BLU Studio 5.0 counts with a brighter screen than ZTE Tempo Go, although it has a bit worse 800 x 480 pixels resolution and a little bit worse screen density, they both have a screen with the same size. ZTE Tempo Go has a bit superior CPU than BLU Studio 5.0, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 512 MB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
BLU Studio 5.0 captures slightly better pictures and videos than ZTE Tempo Go. Both have the same 1280x720 (HD) video resolution, a camera with a 5 mega-pixels and the same video frame rates. ZTE Tempo Go counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than BLU Studio 5.0, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo Go also has 8 GB internal memory.
The ZTE Tempo Go counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than BLU Studio 5.0, because it has a 2200mAh battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the ZTE Tempo Go is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.