Compare phones
BLU Studio 5.0 S II
D572aD572a
| Global Score | |
| 51.2 | 57.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | ZTE |
| Android 4.2 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-07-14 |
| 5.71 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.12 ounces |
| White | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 220 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 900 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Blade Spark is much better than BLU Studio 5.0 S II, with a global score of 57.4 against 51.2. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but the ZTE Blade Spark has a newer 7.1 Nougat version while BLU Studio 5.0 S II has Android 4.2 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and better performance. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the ZTE Blade Spark is a just a little heavier and thicker phone than BLU Studio 5.0 S II.
The BLU Studio 5.0 S II counts with a bit better processing power than ZTE Blade Spark, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the BLU Studio 5.0 S II also counts with an additional graphics processor. The BLU Studio 5.0 S II features just a bit better looking display than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a bit inferior pixel count per inch of display, a little smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 960 x 540px.
ZTE Blade Spark features a superior storage to store more games and applications than BLU Studio 5.0 S II, because it has 12 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. BLU Studio 5.0 S II has a slightly better camera than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a worse (Full HD) video definition and a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The ZTE Blade Spark has a superior battery duration than BLU Studio 5.0 S II, because it has a 57 percent more battery capacity.
The ZTE Blade Spark costs a bit more money than the BLU Studio 5.0 S II, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.