Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 200 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is much better than BLU Studio 5.5 S, with an 81 score against 49.6. The LG G7 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than BLU Studio 5.5 S. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and BLU Studio 5.5 S has Android 4.2 version.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a faster processor than BLU Studio 5.5 S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much sharper screen than BLU Studio 5.5 S, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a way higher pixels amount per inch of screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ takes a lot better pictures and videos than BLU Studio 5.5 S, because it has a way better 16 MP resolution camera in the back and a much higher video quality. LG G7 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than BLU Studio 5.5 S, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with better battery duration than BLU Studio 5.5 S, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG G7 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.