Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.20 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE's 58.7 general score. LG V35 ThinQ's body is lighter and thinner than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better pixels amount per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V35 ThinQ shoots greater photos and videos than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage for games and applications than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery performance than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.