Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 64.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.1.2, 4.0, 2.3.6, 2.3.5 |
| -- | 2011-10-18 |
| 6.44 x 3.20 x 0.36 inches | 5.15 x 2.71 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 4.48 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Kevlar |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 169.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 540 x 960 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Advanced |
| 367 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | TI OMAP4430 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.40 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (120 fps) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1780mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | 204 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid RAZR has a global score of 64.3, which is just a bit better than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE's 58.7 score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Droid RAZR has 4.1.2 version while BLU Studio 6.0 LTE has Android 4.4.2 version. Motorola Droid RAZR's design is notably thinner and much lighter than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE.
The BLU Studio 6.0 LTE features a sharper screen than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a much bigger display and a greater screen density. BLU Studio 6.0 LTE features a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Droid RAZR, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE also has an external SD slot that admits up to 64 GB.
The BLU Studio 6.0 LTE features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid RAZR, because although it has a weaker graphics processing unit running at 450 megahertz, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores. BLU Studio 6.0 LTE counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Droid RAZR, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 1780mAh.
Motorola Droid RAZR counts with a slightly better camera than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 8 mega-pixels resolution and a worse (Full HD) video resolution.
The Motorola Droid RAZR is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.