Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.20 x 0.36 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is much better than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE's general score of 58.7. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active design is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit sharper display than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a bit better processor than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has 48 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has greater battery duration than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity. Galaxy S8 Active shoots much clearer pictures and videos than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy S8 Active not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.