Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 7.48 x 3.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 210 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a lot better than the BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, with a global score of 87.1 against 52.3. The LG Velvet counts with a really superior hardware performance than BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, because it has more RAM and more CPU cores. The LG Velvet has a little more vivid display than BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a lot better pixels number per screen inch.
The LG Velvet has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 112 GB more internal memory. LG Velvet counts with a little better battery lifetime than BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The LG Velvet shoots a lot better pictures and videos than BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, because it has a much higher video quality and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also cheap compared to the BLU Studio 7.0 LTE, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.