Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | -- |
| 2015-09-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.59 x 2.68 x 0.20 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a lot better than BLU Vivo Air LTE's 54.3 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is newer than BLU Vivo Air LTE, it is thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy A50 features a superior performance than BLU Vivo Air LTE, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy A50 has a more vivid display than BLU Vivo Air LTE, because it has a better pixels density, a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a much bigger display. Galaxy A50 captures greater photos and videos than BLU Vivo Air LTE, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Galaxy A50 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than BLU Vivo Air LTE, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior battery lifetime than BLU Vivo Air LTE, because it has a 95% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 costs a bit more than the BLU Vivo Air LTE, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.