Compare phones
Samsung Rugby Smart
SGH-I847| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 59.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 2.3.5 |
| 2015-09-22 | 2012-02-23 |
| 5.59 x 2.68 x 0.20 inches | 4.82 x 2.59 x 0.48 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 4.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 3.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 252 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Single-Core 1400 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.1 | 7.74 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 7.59 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.4 | 4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 384 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 4 | 3.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Rugby Smart has a global score of 59.4, which is a little bit better than the BLU Vivo Air LTE's 54.3 global score. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Rugby Smart has 2.3.5 version and BLU Vivo Air LTE has Android 5.0 Lollipop. Even being the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also much older, noticeably thicker and heavier.
The BLU Vivo Air LTE has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has 3 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Rugby Smart counts with a little more vivid display than BLU Vivo Air LTE, although it has a little bit worse pixels density, a really smaller screen and a much lower 800 x 480 pixels resolution.
Samsung Rugby Smart captures slightly better videos and photos than BLU Vivo Air LTE, although it has a much lower 5 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot lower video quality. The BLU Vivo Air LTE counts with more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Rugby Smart, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 16 GB internal memory capacity.
BLU Vivo Air LTE has longer battery duration than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has a 2050mAh battery capacity against 1650mAh.
The Samsung Rugby Smart not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.