Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2018-12-06 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.19 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 134.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 440 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.03 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S4 has a global score of 76.1, which is a lot better than BLU VIVO XL4's overall score of 60.3. The Galaxy S4 is a incredibly lighter phone than the BLU VIVO XL4, but they have the same thickness. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S4 has the older 4.4.2 version while BLU VIVO XL4 has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The BLU VIVO XL4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. Galaxy S4 counts with a brighter display than BLU VIVO XL4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S4 has a superior camera than BLU VIVO XL4. They have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a back facing camera with a 13 MP resolution. BLU VIVO XL4 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S4, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that holds up to 128 GB.
The BLU VIVO XL4 counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S4 is also cheap compared to the BLU VIVO XL4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.