Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.2 | 57.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Casio | ZTE |
| Android 4.0 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2013-06-25 | 2017-07-14 |
| 5.10 x 2.70 x 0.50 inches | 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.12 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | -- |
| 233 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Blade Spark is slightly better than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, having a general score of 57.4 against 52.2. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Blade Spark has 7.1 Nougat version while Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE has Android 4.0 version. ZTE Blade Spark's body is newer, extremely thinner and a bit lighter than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE.
The Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE has just a bit better screen than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a bit lower pixel density, a way lower 800 x 480 resolution and a really smaller display. ZTE Blade Spark has a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the ZTE Blade Spark also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The ZTE Blade Spark features a bit more powerful processing unit than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has more cores and a larger amount of RAM. The ZTE Blade Spark captures a little bit better videos and photos than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Blade Spark also has a way better 13 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The ZTE Blade Spark has a superior battery life than Casio G'zOne Commando 4G LTE, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
ZTE Blade Spark not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.