Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-30 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.82 x 2.89 x 0.50 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.87 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 540 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is a lot better than the CAT S60's 59.2 general score. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the CAT S60. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much better looking display than CAT S60, because it has a really bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a much better screen density.
CAT S60 has just a bit more memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a superior hardware performance than CAT S60, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
CAT S60 features just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior camera than CAT S60, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4 XL is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.