Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.42 x 3.07 x 0.51 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a lot better than CAT S61, getting a 92.8 score against 64.8. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and CAT S61 counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Apple iPhone 12 Pro's construction is much newer, extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than CAT S61. Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a superior hardware performance than CAT S61, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a more vivid display than CAT S61, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a better 1170 x 2532 resolution. CAT S61 features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
CAT S61 has a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 60% more battery capacity. The iPhone 12 Pro takes much better photos and videos than CAT S61, although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a lower video definition.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro costs exactly the same than the CAT S61, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.