Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.07 x 0.51 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than CAT S61, with a 93.3 score against 64.8. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while CAT S61 counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's design is notably newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than the CAT S61. IPhone 13 Pro features a much better looking screen than CAT S61, because it has a just a bit better quantity of pixels per display inch, a larger screen and a better 1170 x 2532 resolution.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a better processor than CAT S61, because although it has 2 less cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bits processor. CAT S61 features a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a superior camera than CAT S61, although it has a lower video resolution and a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera. CAT S61 counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Apple iPhone 13 Pro is also cheaper than the CAT S61, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.