Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.07 x 0.51 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than the CAT S61's general score of 64.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is way newer, extremely thinner and lighter than CAT S61. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better processing power than CAT S61, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The CAT S61 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each display inch. The CAT S61 features a slightly better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a greater camera than CAT S61, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution. CAT S61 has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 and the CAT S61 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.