Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
16 GB| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 69.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2012-05-03 |
| 6.42 x 3.07 x 0.51 inches | 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 4.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| -- | 300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III is a bit better than CAT S61, getting a overall score of 69.7 against 64.8. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S III has an older 4.3 version while CAT S61 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S III design is way lighter and incredibly thinner than CAT S61, although it was released 6 years before.
Galaxy S III has just a bit better looking screen than CAT S61, although it has a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, a little bit smaller display and a way lower pixel amount per inch of display. CAT S61 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The CAT S61 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM. CAT S61 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a lot more megapixels camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The CAT S61 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 114 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S III is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.