Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.42 x 3.07 x 0.51 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than the CAT S61, getting a global score of 94.8 against 64.8. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and CAT S61 has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a newer cellphone, and it is also way lighter and notably thinner than the CAT S61.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processing power than CAT S61, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more vivid display than CAT S61, because it has a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen, a way higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than CAT S61, because although it has a way less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality. Galaxy S20 features a superior memory for apps and games than CAT S61, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The CAT S61 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 costs exactly the same than CAT S61, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.