Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.8 | 71.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-09-26 |
| 6.42 x 3.07 x 0.51 inches | 6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest green, Mineral grey and Pearl white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 239.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | MediaTek Helio G90T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 3.41 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro is just a bit better than CAT S61, having a 71.1 score against 64.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro counts with Android OS, while CAT S61 comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro's body is newer, extremely lighter and a lot thinner than CAT S61. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro counts with a processor that is just as good as the CAT S61 one, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has a slightly better looking display than CAT S61, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger screen. The CAT S61 takes a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro. They have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to the CAT S61 one, they have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB and equal internal memory capacity. CAT S61 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro both feature really similar batteries.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.