Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 6.35 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 6.64 ounces |
| Black | Neon blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 586.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G8 is just a bit better than CAT S62 Pro, with a 74.4 score against 67.7. Although Moto G8 and the CAT S62 Pro were only released 6 months apart, Moto G8 is extremely lighter and much thinner. These devices have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
CAT S62 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the CAT S62 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. CAT S62 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a much greater display density.
CAT S62 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G8, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Moto G8 takes clearer videos and photos than CAT S62 Pro, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much higher 16 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Motorola Moto G8 counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as CAT S62 Pro's battery lifetime.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Moto G8 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.