Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 74.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 586.00 | $ 270.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto X4 has a score of 74.4, which is a little bit better than the CAT S62 Pro's overall score of 67.7. Despite of the fact that the Motorola Moto X4 is notably older than the CAT S62 Pro, it's body is extremely thinner and much lighter. The Moto X4 counts with a bit more vivid display than CAT S62 Pro, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a quite smaller screen, they both have a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
CAT S62 Pro has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X4, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The CAT S62 Pro and the Moto X4 feature similar processors, and although the Moto X4 has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The CAT S62 Pro features longer battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 33 percent more battery size. The Motorola Moto X4 has a slightly better camera than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor and a same resolution camera in the back, the Motorola Moto X4 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Moto X4 is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.