Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 586.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is much better than CAT S62 Pro, getting a 76.2 score against 67.7. Nubia Red Magic 5S's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the CAT S62 Pro, even when both were released only 0 months apart. These phones have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processor than CAT S62 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid screen than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger display.
The CAT S62 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal internal storage, the CAT S62 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater camera than CAT S62 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a camera with a way better 64 MP resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little bit longer battery life than CAT S62 Pro, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.