Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 586.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is much better than the CAT S62 Pro's 67.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an a lot older cellphone than the CAT S62 Pro, but it is way lighter and way thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better looking screen than CAT S62 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a quite better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better CPU than CAT S62 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots clearer photos and videos than CAT S62 Pro, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos, a much better video quality and a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
The CAT S62 Pro features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB, the CAT S62 Pro also has 64 GB more internal memory. CAT S62 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition costs a little more than CAT S62 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.