Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 586.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the CAT S62 Pro's overall score of 67.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than CAT S62 Pro, even when both were released only 0 months apart. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and CAT S62 Pro has Android 10, providing lots of additional features and better performance.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processor than CAT S62 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little bit better screen than CAT S62 Pro, because it has a bigger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than CAT S62 Pro, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a same size back camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a way better video definition.
The CAT S62 Pro has superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a bit more than CAT S62 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.