Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-20 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 586.00 | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a score of 81.2, which is better than CAT S62 Pro's global score of 67.7. Although Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is older than the CAT S62 Pro, it's body is thinner and way lighter. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than CAT S62 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
CAT S62 Pro and Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 feature similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 has a bit inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 takes a little bit better videos and photos than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photos, and they both have a camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a bit bigger storage for games and applications than CAT S62 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The CAT S62 Pro features superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is a little more expensive than the CAT S62 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.