Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.92 x 2.74 x 0.59 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 340.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 504 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a lot better than the Caterpillar CAT B15Q, having a global score of 81.9 against 50.2. The Google Pixel 4 design is notably thinner and just a little lighter than Caterpillar CAT B15Q. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a better processing unit than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid display than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has a way bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a much greater pixel density. Google Pixel 4 has a way better camera than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Google Pixel 4 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a very superior battery duration than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has a 40% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper than the Caterpillar CAT B15Q, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.