Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cat | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-29 |
| 4.92 x 2.74 x 0.59 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 340.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 504 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, getting a general score of 90.8 against 50.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Caterpillar CAT B15Q has Android 4.4 version, so it gives some extra features and some performance improvements. Galaxy A51 5G's design is just a bit heavier but much thinner than Caterpillar CAT B15Q.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better display than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has a really bigger display, a way greater pixels count per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has a way better 48 megapixels resolution back camera. Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Caterpillar CAT B15Q, because it has a 125% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.